ArticleArquivos de gastroenterologia2026
CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS ASSOCIATED WITH BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS.
Article in Arquivos de gastroenterologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe main clinical impact of superficial neoplasms associated with Barrett's esophagus lies in their increasing oncogenic potential in the medium and long term. For this reason, the main international guidelines agree on the importance of their early eradication. However, controversy persists as to the most appropriate endoscopic resection technique either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) that guarantees the best resective quality standards.
objectiveThis study aims to present the results of the clinical application of endoscopic submucosal dissection to manage superficial esophageal neoplasms in Barrett's esophagus.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively collected database on consecutive patients treated with ESD for superficial neoplasms associated with Barrett's esophagus, between 2009 and 2022. The following clinical outcomes were assessed: en-bloc, complete and curative resection rates, local recurrence, adverse events and procedure-related mortality.
resultsEsophageal ESD was carried out in 27 patients with a final histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in 55.6% and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 44.4%. En bloc and complete resection rates were 96.2% and 85.1%, respectively. The curative resection rate was 77.7%. Adverse events occurred in two cases (7.4%). The mean post ESD endoscopic follow up was 22.1 months. Disease free survival rate at 2 years was 88.9%.
conclusionESD performed by trained endoscopists is feasible, safe and clinically effective for managing early Barrett's esophagus neoplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.