ArticleClinical and experimental rheumatology2026
Clonal haematopoiesis and risk of incident rheumatoid arthritis: results from the UK Biobank.
Article in Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CH), somatic genetic mutations conferring stem cells selective advantage, are associated with increased inflammatory cytokine production, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and malignancy. We investigated whether CH was related to risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an inflammatory autoimmune disease.
methodsWithin the UK Biobank, we studied 186,577 unrelated individuals with baseline data collection, genome-wide genotyping, whole exome sequencing (WES) read for CHIP, and linked general practice (GP) data for identification of incident RA in follow-up. We excluded those with prevalent RA or taking RA medications at baseline. We tested for associations between variant allele fraction (VAF) >2% and >10% for the 8 most common CHIP mutations in the general population, and incident RA, identified by billing code algorithms. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR, 95% confidence interval) for incident RA.
results594 participants developed incident RA over median follow-up 7.1 years (IQR 6.4-8.0); median time to RA was 3.9 years (IQR 2.0-5.6). Incident RA cases were slightly older at enrolment, more likely to be female, have smoked, have higher body mass index (BMI), and have prevalent CVD, and hypercholesterolaemia at baseline. However, there was no difference in the presence of CHIP mutations at baseline; 6.3% vs. 6.4% of those who did and did not develop incident RA in follow-up had any CHIP mutation at >2% VAF.
conclusionsCommon CHIP mutations, including TET2, TP53, and SF3B1 mutations, were not associated with risk of incident RA when restricted to those with most complete general outpatient and hospital record follow-up in the UK Biobank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.