ArticlePloS one2026
Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and computerized cognitive training for post-stroke cognitive recovery: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial with optimized temporal intervention sequences.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-stroke cognitive impairment is a common and severe complication of stroke, significantly affecting patients' daily life and rehabilitation. Although transcranial direct current stimulation combined with computerized cognitive training has shown potential for improvement, current studies still have key limitations. Most have used only simultaneous intervention protocols, without systematically comparing sequential combination strategies, making it difficult to determine the optimal clinical approach.
objectivesThe core objective of this study will be to address the existing research gap by comparing sequential intervention strategies and to resolve the key issue of identifying the optimal clinical approach.
methodsThis study will use a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial design. A total of 60 patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to four groups: three intervention groups receiving computerized cognitive training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation at different timings (pre-training, concurrent, or post-training), and one sham control group. All interventions will be administered five times a week for two consecutive weeks. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention. DISCUSSION: This trial will systematically evaluate the optimal timing strategies for combining tDCS and CCT in PSCI. The hypothesized mechanisms are: (1) synchronous stimulation enhancing cognitive processing efficiency through immediate synaptic changes, (2) pre-training stimulation promoting plasticity via long-term potentiation-like modifications, and (3) post-training stimulation consolidating training effects by modulating neuronal synchrony. High-sensitivity cerebral oxygenation parameters will be used to assess microcirculatory improvements, linking physiological changes to cognitive recovery. However, ceiling effects and test biases will potentially limit the accuracy of long-term results, while sample size and lack of stratification based on brain lesion characteristics may introduce heterogeneity. Future studies will need to incorporate multimodal neuroimaging for stratified analysis and should develop personalized interventions based on lesion severity, disease stage, and timing to address therapeutic challenges and advance precision rehabilitation. Trial registration: ChiCTR2500102565.[Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), https://www.chictr.org.cn/] [Registered on May 16, 2025].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.