ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Review of the Use of Digital Therapeutics for Obesity Treatment: Toward a Psychological Phenotyping.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital therapeutics (DTx) offer an innovative opportunity for the prevention and treatment of obesity. However, their efficacy remains limited by a standardized approach that often does not adequately consider interindividual differences in eating behavior, motivation, mental comorbidities, and emotional regulation. Currently, many DTx rely primarily on physical indicators such as body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure, overlooking psychological factors that influence adherence and intervention success. Given that obesity is a multifactorial pathology, it is crucial to develop a more personalized approach, including psychological phenotyping. This method involves the categorization of patients according to key psychological dimensions: personality, eating behavior, psychological burden, emotional regulation, motivation, health literacy, body image, and social support. Such classification may enable optimization of DTx relevance and clinical impact, contingent on algorithm validation and integration with clinical oversight. This narrative review explores the psychological dimensions involved in obesity and how they may be used to inform personalization strategies in DTx. Through an analysis of existing studies, we identify underexplored psychological dimensions and suggest the integration in DTx to enhance patient assessment and monitoring. Finally, we discuss the clinical and methodological implications of psychological phenotyping, highlighting its value for healthcare professionals, who could achieve greater efficiency through better-tailored recommendations and optimizing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.