Trial reportJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2026
P2Y
Trial report in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: What Can We Learn from a Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the ACUTE-PRAS Study?Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore whether the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and clopidogrel vary according to patient background factors in the ACUTE-PRAS study.
methodsThis was a post hoc, hypothesis-generating, exploratory analysis of the multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled ACUTE-PRAS study, in which 176 patients with acute atherothrombotic stroke or high-risk TIA received prasugrel or clopidogrel within 48 h of symptom onset. High platelet reactivity (HPR; platelet reaction units [PRU] >208) and absolute PRU were assessed on Day 5 in subgroups stratified by ABCD-GENE score, age, body mass index (BMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, dyslipidemia, time from stroke onset to treatment, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and prior ischemic stroke.
resultsPatients with prasugrel had numerically lower rates of HPR than those with clopidogrel in the high-risk stratum of ABCD-GENE score ≥ 10 (OR 2.73, p = 0.076), and favorable trends in prasugrel were also observed for CKD (8.06, p = 0.012), age >75 years (5.02, p = 0.025), BMI <25 kg/m² (4.61, p = 0.012), dyslipidemia (4.73, p = 0.009), DM (3.86, p = 0.038), treatment initiation ≤ 24 h (3.31, p = 0.010), and NIHSS ≤ 3 (2.77, p = 0.036) or ≥ 4 (9.00, p = 0.025). Prasugrel also reduced PRU numerically more than clopidogrel across most subgroups, except in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
conclusionsPrasugrel provided favorable early platelet inhibition, particularly in subgroups characterized by advanced age, CKD, low BMI, metabolic comorbidities, or very early treatment start.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.