ReviewAcademic radiology2026
From Artificial Intelligence to Robotics: How to Navigate Technological Innovation in Radiology With the Gartner Hype Cycle.
Review in Academic radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alignment of Policy, Practice, and Patient Safety for Trustworthy AI in Radiology.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiology is rapidly evolving across both technology and practice, making it difficult to distinguish innovations with genuine lasting impact from those that may fade after initial enthusiasm. In this narrative review, we use an expert-informed framework and a targeted appraisal of the literature to map key advances in radiology onto the Gartner hype cycle, across three key areas: software and algorithms, advanced imaging tools and techniques, and clinical practice paradigms. We provide strategic considerations for radiologists, trainees, and leaders, including potential future implications for the specialty. Together, radiologists, trainees, and leaders play distinct and complementary roles in guiding the adoption of emerging technologies, from deepening clinical-technical expertise to developing systemic governance and infrastructure that supports safe, evidence-driven implementation. As part 6 of the Radiology Research Alliance (RRA) review series on emerging technologies in collaboration with the University of Maryland Institute for Health Computing (UM-IHC) and the Medical Intelligent Imaging (UM2ii) Center, this paper provides a critical perspective on how radiologists, trainees, and leaders can navigate the hype cycle to identify meaningful innovations and guide strategic adoption in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.