ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Autonomous AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening at primary care is associated with increased presentation to eye care by at risk patients.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult patients with diabetes (n = 3745) seen at Johns Hopkins Medicine primary care sites were referred to the Wilmer Eye Institute either based on a primary care provider referral or autonomous AI diagnostic result (referral was made after a positive or non-diagnostic result). An inverse-probability-weighted regression, which incorporated propensity score matching on social determinants of health and relevant clinical variables, showed that implementation of an autonomous AI-assisted diabetic screening program in a primary care clinic was associated with increased presentation to eye care specialist care by African-Americans (p = 0.02). This is significant because African-Americans have traditionally been less likely to undergo annual screening exams and more likely to present with more severe forms of diabetic retinopathy (DR). The results suggest a potential association between office-based, AI-assisted DR screening and improved downstream ophthalmic access for African-American patients. However, given that the analysis was exploratory, this association should be interpreted cautiously and further validated.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.