Evidence mapPaperPMID 41781870Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

The ongoing quest for the independent patient: an interview study on healthcare professionals' perspectives on integrating self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension care.

Erica Kelemit, Elnura Halmambetova, Evalill Nilsson, Cecilia Fagerström, Linda Ljungholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erica KelemitDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar-Växjö, Sweden.
Elnura HalmambetovaDepartment of Research, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden.
Evalill NilssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar-Växjö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4497-8313
Cecilia FagerströmDepartment of Research, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-282X
Linda LjungholmDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, SE-392 31, Sweden. linda.ljungholm@lnu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-7610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome-based self-monitoring of blood pressure has been proposed as a way to enhance patient engagement and self-management of hypertension while potentially reducing pressure on primary healthcare services. Although the effects of self-monitoring are well-documented, less is known about healthcare professionals’ experiences of supporting patients with self-monitoring, or the potential added value of patient-reported measures (questionnaires) of health and self-care in hypertension care.

aimTo explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of supporting patients in self-monitoring of blood pressure and, in addition, their reflections on the idea that patient-reported measures of health and self-care could provide added value in hypertension care.

methodA qualitative study with an inductive approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 informants involved in the care of patients with hypertension who self-monitored their blood pressure. The interviews underwent reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsHealthcare professionals’ experiences of supporting patients with self-monitoring of blood pressure suggest that self-monitoring can promote patient independence through participation in own health and self-care. However, it may also trigger anxiety in some individuals, underscoring the need for appropriate education and support. When presented with the idea of complementing self-monitoring of blood pressure with questionnaires, healthcare professionals reflected on potential benefits, such as enabling individualised care, identifying patients with greater need for support, and facilitating more preventive approaches to hypertension and its complications.

conclusionSelf-monitoring of blood pressure can support hypertension self-management, particularly when data reporting is simplified. Combining the practices of self-monitoring of blood pressure with patient-reported measures may have the potential to enhance person-centred and preventive care. However, clear responsibilities and standardised procedures and professional support are essential to balance patient autonomy with safety.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHealth PersonnelHypertensionSelf CareAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQualitative ResearchE-healthHypertensionPatient-reported dataPerson-centred careSelf-careSelf-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41781870
PMCPMC13063534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.