ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Quantitative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cell immunomodulatory potency and cost-effectiveness of cytokine licensing for translational application.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess strong immunomodulatory properties and are increasingly applied in inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases. Cytokine licensing, particularly with interferon-γ (IFN-γ), further enhances their therapeutic potential. However, standardized and quantitative approaches for evaluating MSC immunomodulatory capacity remain limited.
methodsWe established a quantitative rating scale to assess the immunomodulatory capacity of MSCs and their extracellular vesicles. Using human bone marrow-derived MSC datasets, four weighting approaches, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), the Entropy method, and the Independence method, were applied to determine the relative importance of indicators including T-cell suppression, regulatory T-cell induction, and key molecular markers. Cytokine licensing strategies were compared and paired with an economic feasibility assessment.
resultsPCA and AHP performed best for indicator prioritization, with PCA yielding balanced weight distribution and AHP providing strong discriminative ability. Entropy and Independence methods emphasized variability and independence but showed weaker differentiation. IFN-γ was identified as the most effective licensing cytokine, while dual-licensing combinations such as IFN-γ/TGF-β1 achieved the highest overall immunomodulatory scores. Economic evaluation similarly favored IFN-γ–containing strategies, particularly in combination with TGF-β1.
conclusionsThis study proposes an integrated framework combining immunomodulatory evaluation and economic feasibility to support standardized assessment of MSC function. The findings inform optimization of cytokine licensing strategies and may guide future clinical and economic decision-making for MSC-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.