ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Radiomics features and clinical factors for predicting restenosis following endovascular therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo construct a predictive model for post-endovascular restenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease based on a novel strategy that integrates radiomics features with clinical factors, aiming to enhance predictive performance and risk assessment.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent CT angiography and clinical evaluation. The dataset was randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. A combined model was developed using multivariable logistic regression. Subsequently, the model was internally validated and a nomogram was constructed. Additionally, models were trained using SVM, Xgboost, KNN, Adaboost, and CatBoost algorithms. The optimal model was assessed through SHAP analysis to evaluate the importance of each feature in predicting restenosis after endovascular treatment for peripheral artery disease.
resultsAfter standardization, univariate analysis, and LASSO regression with 5-fold cross-validation for dimensionality reduction, five optimal radiomics features and three clinical factors selected via logistic regression were used to construct the model. Among various models, CatBoost demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training and validation sets being 0.985 and 0.878, respectively. SHAP interpretability analysis revealed that the four most important global features influencing the CatBoost model output were, in order, Radiomics Score, PACSS, length, and hypertension.
conclusionThe CatBoost model provides superior support for early identification of individuals at higher risk of restenosis after endovascular treatment for peripheral artery disease. It offers a foundation for implementing more targeted prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.