In one paragraphArticle in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
- AssociatedPublication
- Erratum issued
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
32 authors.
Andrey A TomarovskyLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-704X Azamat A TotikovLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-631X Tatiana M BulyonkovaYouth Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk 628011, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-2001 Polina L PerelmanLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0982-5100 Natalia A SerdyukovaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0409-1371 Aliya R YakupovaDivision of Evolutionary Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Planegg 82152, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-0864 Dmitry ProkopovCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-5203 Violetta R BeklemishevaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-4143 Mikkel-Holger S SindingCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, The Globe Institute, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-219X Guzel DavletshinaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-0650-2675 Maria PobedintsevaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8447-9626 Ksenia KrasheninnikovaIndependent Researcher, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Saffron Walden CB10 1RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-2047 Alexandra MironovaLaboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire and Végétale, Univ. Grenoble Alpes/CNRS/CEA/INRA/IRIG, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0009-0000-3831-8151 Wenhui NieState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2914-0619 Jinhuan WangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2814-217X Svetlana A RomanenkoLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0951-5209 Anastasiya A ProskuryakovaLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3812-4853 Malcolm Ferguson-SmithCambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-1381 Elena BalanovskayaLaboratory of Human Population Genetics, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-8300 M Thomas P GilbertCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, The Globe Institute, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-7195 Innokentiy M OkhlopkovInstitute of Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS, Yakutsk 677000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-5216 Alexander S GraphodatskyLaboratory of Diversity and Evolution of Genomes, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-1085 Sergei KliverCenter for Evolutionary Hologenomics, The Globe Institute, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1353, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2965-3617 Funding
Danish National Research FoundationInstitute of Molecular and Cellular BiologyMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FWGZ-2024-0001Roger A Powell and North Carolina State UniversitySierra Pacific Industries of Anderson, CaliforniaSt. Petersburg State Universitythe Carlsbergfondet Research Infrastructure CF22-0680
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The sable (Martes zibellina) and pine marten (Martes martes) are two Palearctic mustelids with long-recognized hybrids (kidases), whose fertility was controversial for years. Early genetic studies confirmed the existence of hybrids beyond F1, but limited marker resolution prevented detailed characterization of hybrid ancestry. Both species were hunted for centuries, but anthropogenic pressures during the 20th-century caused severe bottlenecks in the sable. Hunting bans and large-scale reintroduction programs restored sable populations across much of its range, including the sympatric zone, potentially affecting hybridization. We resequenced 30 individuals from most of the sables' range and the Eastern part of pine marten's. Among samples, we found a broad spectrum of hybrid types with mosaic recombinant chromosomes that confirm hybrid fertility and indicate crossover is not suppressed in kidases. This necessitates re-evaluation of previous research, as we detected notable discrepancies between short tandem repeat-based ancestry and whole-genome analysis. We revealed mitochondrial DNA introgression from sables into most pine martens, indicating displacement of native pine marten mitochondrial sequences. Pine marten heterozygosity is relatively low (∼0.5 to 0.6 hetSNPs/kbp), while sable's diversity (∼1.5 to 1.8 hetSNPs/kbp) is unexpectedly high given its demographic history, likely reflecting successful reintroduction programs. We dated species divergence at 1.52 [confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 2.06] Mya, and identified candidate genes potentially associated with hybrid fertility issues. This study is the first to elucidate marten hybridization at the whole-genome level, opening new research directions for understanding hybridization among Holarctic martens, the genetic consequences of reintroduction programs, and comparative adaptomics.
Indexed as
Hybridization, GeneticMustelidaeAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialGenetic IntrogressionGenomicsMicrosatellite RepeatsDNA, Mitochondrialconservation genomicsgenetic diversityinterspecific hybridizationintrogressionMustelidaespecies divergence
Identifiers
PMID41782206
PMCPMC12960073
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390