Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782463›Full record

SynthesisCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models of Anti-Amyloid Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Lara Herriott, Mark Coles, Nicolas Fournier, Eamonn Gaffney, Jonathan Wagg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lara HerriottMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark ColesKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8079-9358
Nicolas FournierAC Immune SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eamonn GaffneyMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jonathan WaggAC Immune SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models have emerged as useful tools for evaluating the efficacy of Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapies. Bringing together a clinical focus with the mechanistic detail of systems biology, QSP models are well suited to the complexity of AD and have been used to predict treatment outcomes and support regulatory submissions. Therapies targeting the amyloid pathway are prominent in the AD clinical trial landscape, with anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies representing the first approved disease-modifying therapies. To inform and facilitate future QSP model development, a systematic review of published QSP models focused on amyloid-targeting therapies for AD was completed. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched on February 1, 2025, identifying 540 candidate publications. Predefined exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied to identify seven published AD QSP models used to simulate treatment effects for one or more anti-amyloid therapies. The structure, development, and predictions of the models were summarized. Shared and contrasting model features were identified across included models. A set of model quality features was scored against a checklist of 15 criteria adapted from "best practice" guidelines for QSP. Model quality scores were generally low, ranging from 40% to 53%. Key quality issues related to model validation and reproducibility were identified; in particular, none of the seven papers provided executable model code. This systematic review provides useful context to support ongoing efforts to develop and refine QSP models such that they may better inform therapeutic strategies for the treatment of AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesHumansModels, BiologicalSystems BiologyAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer's diseaseamyloid‐betamonoclonal antibodyquantitative systems pharmacologysystematic reviewvirtual clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID41782463
PMCPMC12962395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.