Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782615›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical science advances2026

Breaking through the radiation dilemma: development and clinical translation of anti-radiation drugs.

Lanke Wang, Yan Wang, Siyi Wu, Song Li, Zixuan Qin, Chenyu Wang, Lina Niu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lanke WangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Yan WangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Siyi WuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Song LiDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510182, China.
Zixuan QinState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Chenyu WangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.
Lina NiuState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for effective prevention and treatment of nuclear radiation injuries is underscored by historical nuclear incidents, ongoing challenges such as nuclear wastewater management, and the expanding use of radiation in medicine and industry. Despite the approval of a limited set of drugs such as potassium iodide, Prussian blue, cytokines for hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS), current countermeasures are hindered by a narrow scope of application, significant side effects, and a profound mechanistic knowledge gap. While novel drug development has expanded into various mechanisms such as targeting DNA damage repair and anti-inflammation, yielding promising directions like novel nano-delivery systems, the overall clinical translation rate remains low. To address these challenges, this review synthesizes literature from the past 3 decades with the following aims: (1) to provide an updated analysis of the molecular mechanisms of radiation injury, highlighting newly discovered targets; (2) to critically evaluate drugs across clinical, trial, and preclinical stages; and (3) to introduce a transformative paradigm. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in drug discovery, is a prospect not systematically explored in prior reviews. We posit that integrating mechanistic insights with AI-driven approaches represents a promising path forward. Finally, we propose future directions aimed at overcoming the specific challenges facing AI in this field, including the development of strategies to mitigate model "black-box" effects, the establishment of secure and ethical frameworks for sharing sensitive radiation injury data, and the creation of specialized, high-quality databases to address the critical issue of data scarcity.

Indexed as

Anti-Radiation drugsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPathogenic mechanismRadiation

Identifiers

PMID41782615
PMCPMC12954333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.