ReviewPharmaceutical science advances2026
Breaking through the radiation dilemma: development and clinical translation of anti-radiation drugs.
Review in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The need for effective prevention and treatment of nuclear radiation injuries is underscored by historical nuclear incidents, ongoing challenges such as nuclear wastewater management, and the expanding use of radiation in medicine and industry. Despite the approval of a limited set of drugs such as potassium iodide, Prussian blue, cytokines for hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS), current countermeasures are hindered by a narrow scope of application, significant side effects, and a profound mechanistic knowledge gap. While novel drug development has expanded into various mechanisms such as targeting DNA damage repair and anti-inflammation, yielding promising directions like novel nano-delivery systems, the overall clinical translation rate remains low. To address these challenges, this review synthesizes literature from the past 3 decades with the following aims: (1) to provide an updated analysis of the molecular mechanisms of radiation injury, highlighting newly discovered targets; (2) to critically evaluate drugs across clinical, trial, and preclinical stages; and (3) to introduce a transformative paradigm. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in drug discovery, is a prospect not systematically explored in prior reviews. We posit that integrating mechanistic insights with AI-driven approaches represents a promising path forward. Finally, we propose future directions aimed at overcoming the specific challenges facing AI in this field, including the development of strategies to mitigate model "black-box" effects, the establishment of secure and ethical frameworks for sharing sensitive radiation injury data, and the creation of specialized, high-quality databases to address the critical issue of data scarcity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.