Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782792›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Successful Management of Iatrogenic Aortocoronary Dissection Induced by a Guide Extension Catheter Using Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance.

Yu Sugawara, Tamio Nakajima

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu SugawaraCardiovascular Medicine, Yamato Kashihara Hospital, Kashihara, JPN.
Tamio NakajimaCardiovascular Medicine, Yamato Kashihara Hospital, Kashihara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iatrogenic aortocoronary dissection is an uncommon but potentially life‑threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. We describe a case caused by a guide extension catheter, in which intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enabled precise assessment and successful percutaneous management. A 79-year-old female with exertional chest pain underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after persistent symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Severe, heavily calcified stenosis in the distal right coronary artery required balloon dilatation with a guide extension catheter. Following dilatation, a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) type F dissection with contrast staining in the sinus of Valsalva was detected. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, and the guidewire was in the true lumen. IVUS identified the dissection entry point and extensive intramural hematoma. A drug‑eluting stent was deployed to seal the flap, restoring normal coronary flow. Post‑procedural coronary computed tomography confirmed that the dissection had not propagated into the ascending aorta and was completely sealed. Because the patient remained stable without ischemia or aortic regurgitation, conservative management was continued. Her recovery was uneventful, and follow‑up computed tomography at 10 months demonstrated complete healing. Although guide extension catheter-related aortocoronary dissection is rare, this case highlights the value of IVUS for defining the injury and guiding stent placement. Careful attention to catheter position and avoidance of automatic contrast injection are essential. Early recognition and prompt sealing of the entry site, followed by imaging to assess aortic involvement, are critical for optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

complicationsguide extension catheteriatrogenic aortocoronary dissectionintravascular ultrasoundpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID41782792
PMCPMC12956038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.