ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Guideline-based strategies to identify severe cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19 and cancer immunotherapy using large-scale electronic health records.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) is a life-threatening adverse event of cancer immunotherapies and a complication of infections. Predicting which patients are at risk for severe CRS would inform mitigation decisions and drug development, but requires large, reliably labeled datasets. Methods: This study evaluates the feasibility of disease-agnostic case identification of CRS patterns in large-scale Electronic Health Records (EHR) to generate high-quality cohorts of CRS-positive and CRS-negative patients. Results: Using the Optum® de-identified COVID-19 EHR dataset, we isolated 2.5 million patients with active COVID-19 and 171 individuals treated with the T-cell Engager (TCE) blinatumomab. Diagnosis codes for CRS were underutilized and provided limited information on severity. Instead, we implemented the consensus CRS grading guidelines, which identified 92,541 COVID-19 patients (3.7%) and 54 blinatumomab patients (31.5%) with grade 2 or higher CRS, respectively. Severe CRS COVID-19 patients showed heterogeneous inflammatory levels. Discussion: Our EHR-based CRS case identification strategy is suitable for risk factor analysis and developing CRS risk prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.