ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Pharmacogenomics and genetic ancestry: an opportunity to transform clinical practice in Colombia.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human leukocyte antigen pharmacogenetics in infectious diseases: anti-infective drug toxicity and host immune response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics has emerged as a clinically actionable discipline capable of reducing inter-individual variability in drug response, adverse drug reactions, and therapeutic failure. However, its real-world implementation remains constrained by a structural limitation: the predominance of Eurocentric genomic evidence and its limited clinical portability to genetically heterogeneous and underrepresented populations. This gap undermines the coherence between evidence generation, synthesis, and clinical application, particularly in admixed settings. Colombia represents a high-stakes case for pharmacogenomic implementation due to its marked inter-individual and regional genetic ancestry heterogeneity, coupled with a substantial and partly preventable burden of adverse drug reactions in an ageing and increasingly polypharmacy-exposed population. Direct extrapolation of pharmacogenomics panels and guidelines derived from other populations is therefore clinically risky and scientifically incoherent. In this Perspective, we propose an ancestry-based pharmacological diagnosis (APD) as a clinically oriented framework that integrates individual- and population-level genetic ancestry with actionable pharmacogenomics variants to inform drug selection, dosing, and risk stratification. APD is not a race-based or deterministic approach; rather, it treats ancestry as a probabilistic modifier of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, enhancing the external validity and clinical portability of pharmacogenomic guidance. We highlight CÓDIGO, a nationally led genomic consortium, as a proof-of-concept infrastructure enabling APD by providing ancestry-resolved allele frequencies and actionable variant data across Colombian populations. Finally, we discuss how APD can improve therapeutic efficacy, patient safety, health-system efficiency, equity, and scientific coherence, positioning ancestry-informed pharmacogenomics as a scalable and ethically grounded public-health strategy for precision medicine in Colombia and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.