ReviewMaterials today. Bio2026
Designing adhesive hydrogels for oral diseases treatment.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels for Healing Radiation-Injured Tissues and Organs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application of injectable hydrogels in the treatment of periodontitis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Localized drug delivery in the oral cavity is challenging owing to its wet, dynamic, and microbiologically complex nature. Adhesive hydrogels have attracted increasing attention for their ability to adhere under wet conditions, provide sustained drug release, and respond to pathological environments. This review provides a structured perspective by categorizing advancements into a three-level hierarchy encompassing molecular bonding, network reinforcement, and system-level adaptation. Chemical motifs for interfacial stability and responsive designs are systematically evaluated to enhance site-specific compatibility. Unlike previous reports that primarily cataloged material types, this study distinguishes itself through a rigorous quantitative comparison between experimental hydrogels and clinical gold standards across diverse oral pathologies. A primary differentiator is the emphasis on biomechanical crosstalk where microbial enzymatic activity and mechanical fatigue concurrently dictate the longevity of the adhesive interface. Furthermore, the work identifies systemic disconnects in current testing methodologies and advocates for integrated evaluation paradigms that simulate simultaneous physical and biological stressors. By synthesizing these granular insights, this review offers a comprehensive roadmap for achieving stable and efficient therapy in next-generation oral medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.