ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Ultra-distal bypass remains a valuable option for tibial disease with tissue loss.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pattern of distal tibial calcific disease associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes is challenging to revascularize. Ultra-distal bypass, on to pedal or plantar vessels, is an option for patients who have failed an endovascular approach. The goal of such ultra-distal bypasses is often to achieve wound healing rather than long-term patency. We present a retrospective observational study from an Irish tertiary vascular center. Methods: A retrospective review of all ultra-distal bypasses since 2019 was performed. Cases were identified from theater logs. Electronic health records and formal charts were used to record demographics, comorbidities and outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: Since 2019, 25 limbs in 23 patients underwent ultra-distal bypass for tissue loss, 16 to pedal vessels and 9 to plantars. All patients were male and the median age was 62.0 years (range, 43-85 years). Seventy-two percent (n = 18/25) of the cohort were diabetic, 36% had chronic kidney disease, 4 (16%) were dialysis dependent, and 5 (20%) had congestive heart failure. Median follow-up duration was 14 months (range, 0-51 months). At 12 months, freedom from graft failure was 68% (n = 17/25) and freedom from major amputation was 92% (n = 23/25). At the most recent clinic review, 85% (n = 17/20) of ulcers had healed. Conclusions: Ultra-distal bypasses are a valuable tool in a vascular surgeon's arsenal for tissue loss in patients with complex tibial disease. Although the durability of bypass was variable, the majority of patients included in this study healed their ulcers and only three limbs progressed to major amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.