ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Twelve-Month Outcomes Using Aflibercept 8 mg in Treatment-Naïve and Pretreated Diabetic Macular Edema: A Swiss Retina Research Network Report.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective Real-World Outcomes After Switching to Aflibercept 8 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with High Treatment Burden.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg (Afl 8) for the therapy of treatment-naïve and pretreated diabetic macular edema (DME) in a clinical routine setting. Design: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of consecutive DME patients treated with Afl 8 over 12 months. Subjects: One hundred fifty-six eyes (124 patients) with DME, including 42 (26.9%) treatment-naïve and 114 (73.1%) pretreated eyes receiving Afl 8 for 1 year. Methods: Data from electronic medical records were collected retrospectively at 5 predefined time points. The primary outcomes were the mean changes in corrected visual acuity (VA), center-point retinal thickness (CRT), central subfield thickness (CST), treatment intervals, and adverse events (AEs). Secondary outcomes included the number of injections, persistent fluid, and treatment adherence. These parameters were recorded from the beginning of anti-VEGF treatment until switching occurred in pretreated eyes. Main Outcome Measures: Mean change in VA, CRT, CST, treatment intervals, and AEs. Results: In treatment-naïve eyes, VA improved from 72.9 ± 10.7 ETDRS letters at baseline to 77.7 ± 9.7 ( Conclusions: Afl 8 offers a promising approach to reducing the treatment burden in DME. It enables extended dosing intervals without compromising efficacy and safety, especially in refractory eyes. However, a possibly increased rate of mild IOI has been observed. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.