ArticleAnalytical science advances2026
Stacked Ensemble Model With Explainable AI for Early Detection of Heart Disease.
Article in Analytical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease (HD) is still one of the most common causes of death around the world. Early detection is very important, but it is often hard to do because the symptoms are not specific and the models are not very clear. We propose a two-layer stacked ensemble that combines four base learners-Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naïve Bayes, and Decision Tree-with Logistic Regression as a meta-learner. This ensemble was trained on a balanced sample from five public HD datasets. The model outperforms standard baselines with 93.69% accuracy, 93% F1-score, and 94.7% AUC. To ensure that predictions are clinically interpretable, we offer global explainability through SHAP summaries, feature importance, and stacked plots, as well as ELi5 permutation-importance plots. Both identify ST slope and chest pain type as the most significant predictors, consistent with clinical understanding. We use LIME, ELi5 text explanations, SHAP force plots, and waterfall plots to illustrate how different features of a person affect their risk. We utilize SHAP interaction values to examine feature interactions and confirm nonlinear relationships using 1D and 2D partial-dependence plots. Finally, we generate counterfactual explanations to demonstrate minor, plausible changes based on domain knowledge that would affect a prediction. This is useful both for auditability and for conversations around patient-centred care. The framework combines global and local explainable artificial intelligence with strong predictive power to improve decision support and accuracy in HD risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.