ArticleDigital health
Research on predicting the progression of multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib based on multimodal ensemble learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy characterized by abnormal plasma cell proliferation. While bortezomib has improved outcomes, significant individual variability persists. Accurate early prediction of patient progression is crucial for optimizing therapeutic intensity and improving long-term survival. Developing an automated, multimodal prediction model can provide clinicians with a robust tool for personalized prognosis, thereby reducing the burden of ineffective treatments on patients. Methods: We enrolled 207 newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients treated with bortezomib. Based on 2-year outcomes, patients were categorized into progression and non-progression groups. Bone marrow smear images, electrophoresis images, and baseline clinical data were used to train a multimodal ensemble learning model. Neural networks were employed for image feature extraction-ResNet and MobileNet for bone marrow smears; VGG16 and DenseNet for electrophoresis images. Clinical features were selected using LASSO and modeled with Random Forest and Logistic Regression. The best-performing models from each modality were integrated using a soft voting ensemble strategy. Results: The ensemble model outperformed all single-modality models (area under the curve (AUC): 0.8180, Accuracy: 0.7000). Among single modalities, electrophoresis image-based models performed best-VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy (AUC: 0.8082, Accuracy: 0.7000), and DenseNet showed the highest AUC (0.8088, Accuracy: 0.6200). ResNet was optimal for bone marrow smears (AUC: 0.7295, Accuracy: 0.5800), while Logistic Regression led clinical data performance (AUC: 0.6779, Accuracy: 0.6800). Conclusion: This multimodal ensemble model effectively predicts MM progression by integrating diverse diagnostic data. By enabling earlier identification of high-risk patients, this model serves as a practical decision-support tool for clinicians to tailor personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.