ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Analysis of genetic polymorphisms in sudden sensorineural hearing loss and artificial intelligence-supported individualized precision therapy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RAPID-LC: rapid evidence-to-practice uptake of large core thrombectomy across a stroke consortium.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Multimodal biomarkers in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: integrating immune, vascular, and metabolic perspectives for precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is characterized by acute onset, complex pathogenesis, and visible variability in prognosis, making precise treatment challenging. This article focuses on identifying key factors influencing the treatment outcomes of SSNHL. Methods: Clinical data were collected from 200 SSNHL patients, recording treatment regimens including systemic and intratympanic steroid administration. Genetic polymorphisms were analyzed via blood testing, and a personalized treatment prediction model was constructed and validated. An independent external validation set of 100 cases was included to assess model generalizability. Comparative efficacy predictions were performed among multifactorial logistic regression, convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest, and support vector machine models. Results: As against systemic steroid therapy, intratympanic injection, and combination treatment (corticosteroids combined with retroauricular subtympanic membrane and intratympanic injections) showed superior recovery rates. The distinction between combination treatment and monotherapy was visible ( Conclusion: In SSNHL treatment, the combined approach of postauricular subperiosteal and intratympanic steroid injections was significantly more effective than systemic steroid therapy, representing the optimal treatment choice. Specific genetic polymorphisms were closely associated with treatment response and may serve as molecular biomarkers for personalized therapy. The deep learning CNN model exhibited superior performance in efficacy prediction, surpassing conventional models, and could assist in precision treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.