Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783579›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Analysis of genetic polymorphisms in sudden sensorineural hearing loss and artificial intelligence-supported individualized precision therapy.

Xin Li, Dong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin Li *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Dong Yang *Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Tianjin Third Central Hospital/Central Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is characterized by acute onset, complex pathogenesis, and visible variability in prognosis, making precise treatment challenging. This article focuses on identifying key factors influencing the treatment outcomes of SSNHL. Methods: Clinical data were collected from 200 SSNHL patients, recording treatment regimens including systemic and intratympanic steroid administration. Genetic polymorphisms were analyzed via blood testing, and a personalized treatment prediction model was constructed and validated. An independent external validation set of 100 cases was included to assess model generalizability. Comparative efficacy predictions were performed among multifactorial logistic regression, convolutional neural network (CNN), random forest, and support vector machine models. Results: As against systemic steroid therapy, intratympanic injection, and combination treatment (corticosteroids combined with retroauricular subtympanic membrane and intratympanic injections) showed superior recovery rates. The distinction between combination treatment and monotherapy was visible ( Conclusion: In SSNHL treatment, the combined approach of postauricular subperiosteal and intratympanic steroid injections was significantly more effective than systemic steroid therapy, representing the optimal treatment choice. Specific genetic polymorphisms were closely associated with treatment response and may serve as molecular biomarkers for personalized therapy. The deep learning CNN model exhibited superior performance in efficacy prediction, surpassing conventional models, and could assist in precision treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

AI modelsgenetic polymorphismsindividualized treatmentSSNHLtreatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID41783579
PMCPMC12953067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.