ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Development and Internal Validation of an Early Warning Predictive Model for Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department Utilizing Easily Obtainable Clinical Indicators.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic determinants of metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation and machine learning prediction of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and internally validate an early warning predictive model to identify the risk of critical illness among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data from 3859 patients admitted between November 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 2,703) and a validation cohort (n = 1,156) in a 7:3 ratio. Fourteen readily accessible physiological indicators obtained during the early stage of emergency department presentation were adopted as predictive parameters. Independent predictors of early critical risk were identified in the training cohort using generalized additive models, stepwise multivariate logistic regression and clinical practical considerations. The resulting model was used to stratify risk levels. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in in baseline characteristics between the training and validation cohorts ( Conclusion: The developed predictive model demonstrated good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility for the early identification of patients at critical risk in the ED setting. All predictors can be obtained during the initial clinical assessment, which facilitates real-time application in triage. This practical accessibility supports the model's potential integration into routine emergency workflows and primary healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.