ReviewAJOG global reports2026
The influence of antenatal and pregnancy-related factors on recovery after childbirth: a systematic review.
Review in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify antenatal and pregnancy-related factors that affect recovery after childbirth, with the purpose of improving maternal health, return to work, and social participation. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 2024 using predefined search terms. The review is registered in PROSPERO (#CRD42022361262). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and cross-sectional studies published in English or Dutch that evaluated antenatal and pregnancy-related factors associated with maternal morbidity beyond 6 weeks postpartum among women aged ≥18 years who delivered live-born singletons. A minimum follow-up of 6 weeks postpartum was required.
methodsTwo reviewers independently screened and assessed studies for quality. Data were synthesized narratively, organized by recovery domain.
resultsA total of 56 studies were included. Seven categories of influencing factors were identified: mental health in pregnancy (n=18), demographic and socioeconomic background (n=17), medical and psychological history (n=16), lifestyle in pregnancy (n=12), physical health in pregnancy (n=9), prepregnancy social and lifestyle factors (n=8), and psychosocial resources in pregnancy (n=5). Recovery outcomes included persistent pain, mental health problems, functional ability, and urinary incontinence. Although 47 studies focused on physical or mental health, only 9 studies assessed functional ability. No studies explicitly examined social participation. Previous pain, high body mass index, and antenatal mental health problems were consistently associated with poorer recovery outcomes. In contrast, physical activity, social support, and psychological resilience were generally protective factors.
conclusionPostpartum recovery is influenced by multiple antenatal and pregnancy-related factors. A personalized, biopsychosocial approach to care may improve maternal health outcomes and social participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.