ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Grip and pinch strengths and its association with cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Joint associations of grip strength, lipid levels, and lipid-related genetic risk with atrial fibrillation.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To describe the absolute and body composition-normalized relative grip and pinch strength status in children and adolescents, to analyze the associations between strength indices and cardiometabolic risk. Methods: The baseline survey from 2022 to 2023 conducted by the Beijing Children and Adolescents Health Cohort. Children aged 6-17 years old in Beijing were involved ( Results: 3,252 children and adolescents were included. Both grip and pinch strength increased with age, with boys stronger than girls. Absolute grip strength and Grip-to-MMP ratio were positively associated with the risks of developing low HDL-c, high LDL-c, HBP, and a high MetScore. In contrast, the Grip-to-WT ratio was negatively associated with the risks of high TG, low HDL-c, high LDL-c, HBP, and a high MetScore, while being positively associated with the risk of IFG. Similar patterns were observed for pinch strength and its normalized indices. The Pinch-to-WT ratio and Pinch-to-BMI ratio showed protective, inverse associations with the risks of high TG, low HDL -c, high LDL-c, HBP, and a high MetScore. ROC analysis identified the Grip-to-WT ratio as the strongest predictor of cardiometabolic risk among all indices evaluated. Conclusion: Grip and pinch strengths seemed associated with cardiometabolic risk in children. The Grip/Pinch-to-WT ratio was the best predictor of cardiometabolic risk than all the other strength indices. Testing grip strength might help prevent cardiovascular disease early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.