Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784164›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026

Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes Using a Multi-Modal Ultrasound-Based Machine Learning Model With SHAP Interpretability.

Mingru Gao, Yuping Guo, Xiao Tian, Qian Lv, Junhao Zhao, Haohao Hao, Ning Zhao, Xiaoqiu Dong, Kuo Miao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mingru GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yuping GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0857-2659
Xiao TianSchool of Intelligence Science and Technology, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China.
Qian LvDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Junhao ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Haohao HaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ning ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xiaoqiu DongDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Kuo MiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-3253

Funding

The Project of the Basic Research of the Provincial University of Heilongjiang Province 2024-KYYWF-0265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic value of a machine learning (ML) model based on multi-modal ultrasound features in differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes, and to provide a visual interpretation of model decisions using shapley additive explanations (SHAP).

methodsThis retrospective study included 190 patients with suspected cervical lymph node lesions who obtained a pathological result at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between August 2022 and January 2025. All patients underwent 2D ultrasound, color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), microvascular flow imaging (MVFI), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Clinical data (age and sex) and multi-modal ultrasound features were collected. Univariate analysis was used to identify variables significantly associated with lymph node malignancy. Ten ML algorithms were developed and compared to construct predictive models. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The SHAP framework was applied to interpret the decision-making process of the optimal model.

resultsUnivariate analysis identified 18 features significantly associated with malignancy, including age, short axis, L/S ratio, morphology, cortical thickness, cortical echogenicity, calcification, cystic change, hyperechoic foci, reticular/cord-like echogenicity, hilum visibility, CDFI vascular pattern, pulsatility index (PI), MVFI vascular pattern, vascularity index (VI), CEUS enhancement pattern, enhancement uniformity, and necrotic regions. Among the 10 ML algorithms, the gradient boosting machine (GBM) model achieved the best diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.967-1.000), accuracy of 0.929, sensitivity of 0.879, specificity of 0.965, and F1 score of 0.935 on the test set. The GBM model significantly outperformed an experienced ultrasound physician (AUC = 0.904, p = .03). SHAP interpretation revealed that the most influential features for prediction included CEUS enhancement pattern, L/S ratio, age, PI, and VI. The case-based analysis further demonstrated that malignant lymph nodes were commonly associated with a combination of centripetal heterogeneous enhancement on CEUS, L/S <2, presence of hyperechoic foci, mixed-type vascularity on MVFI, and elevated VI values.

conclusionThe GBM model based on multi-modal ultrasound features enables accurate differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. SHAP provides a transparent, visual interpretation of model decisions, demonstrating a novel methodological framework that integrates multi-modal data with explainable AI, supporting its potential as a reliable tool for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMachine LearningContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeckRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyContrast Mediabenign and malignantlymph nodesmachine learningmulti‐modal ultrasoundSHAP

Identifiers

PMID41784164
PMCPMC13356311

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.