ArticleBipolar disorders2026
Empowering Quality of Life Monitoring and Self-Management in Bipolar Disorder: Pilot Evaluation of the PolarUs App.
Article in Bipolar disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultural Adaptation of a Digital Mobile App for Bipolar Disorder (PolarUs): Protocol for a Qualitative Co-Design Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSmartphone apps facilitate the dissemination of resources to help people with bipolar disorder (BD) implement self-management strategies. However, current apps do not address all treatment outcomes valued by people with BD, nor are they designed with scalability in mind. This study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an alpha version of the co-designed PolarUs app, a self-guided intervention developed to support quality of life (QoL) self-monitoring and self-management in BD.
methodsNorth American residents with a confirmed diagnosis of BD used the iOS PolarUs app for 12 weeks. To assess feasibility, adherence rates were assessed, operationalized by completion of weekly in-app Brief Quality of Life in BD (QoL.BD) scores. Linear mixed modeling was used to test the hypothesis that QoL (primary outcome) would improve over the intervention period and explore secondary outcomes (i.e., mood symptoms, self-efficacy, subjective recovery, self-compassion). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to investigate associations between app adherence and primary outcomes.
resultsIn 170 participants (70% women, mean age 39 years SD = 12.1) there was a steady decline in app adherence over the intervention period, with 37% of participants completing their final weekly assessment. However, significant improvements were observed overall for QoL, mood symptoms, and self-compassion. Four distinct app adherence clusters were observed, displaying varying relationships with baseline QoL and trajectories of QoL improvement.
conclusionsPreliminary adherence and efficacy data for the PolarUs app are positive and demonstrate how the inclusion of lived experience perspectives in app development supports intervention acceptability and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.