ArticleJournal of renal care2026
"Understanding Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management Barriers and Facilitators: A Consumer-Led Qualitative Study".
Article in Journal of renal care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-Designed Self-Management Programme for People Living With Kidney Failure.Journal of renal care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough self-management is essential for slowing the progression of chronic kidney disease and improving quality of life, patients continue to face substantial and varied challenges in managing their condition. Existing research has identified barriers to self-management but less is known about the barriers and facilitators experienced by patients with advanced chronic kidney disease not yet receiving kidney replacement therapy (dialysis and transplantation). Furthermore, few studies have been consumer-led or have integrated clinician and patient perspectives in a shared discussion environment.
aimTo explore the barriers to, and facilitators of, chronic kidney disease self-management from the perspectives of key stakeholders, using a consumer-led qualitative approach.
methodsPatients with chronic kidney disease and clinicians were purposively sampled from a large renal service in South Australia to participate in a focus group interview, co-facilitated by a person living with chronic kidney disease. Three, 2-h focus group interviews involving 11 renal consumers and six renal clinicians were undertaken following a semi-structured interview guide that was co-developed with renal consumers and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsSix themes emerged: patient individuality, information and education resources, disease and treatment burden, healthcare team services, patient-clinician relationships, and teaching and learning strategies. Identified barriers included patient passivity, limited chronic kidney disease awareness, fragmented care, impersonal clinical approaches, and physical/emotional distress. Facilitators included positive attitudes, goal setting, trust and satisfaction with clinicians, effective communication, shared decision-making, person-centred care and caregiver support.
conclusionThis study identified that chronic kidney disease self-management is influenced by interacting personal factors, relational factors and systemic factors. These qualitative insights demonstrate that patients' ability to self-manage is shaped not only by knowledge, but by emotional burden, confidence, and the quality of relationships within the healthcare system. Consumer-led approaches that reflect these lived experiences may enhance the relevance and acceptability of future self-management support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.