ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Plasma p-tau217 assays effectively predict amyloid status but lack precision for tau staging in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have demonstrated high performance in identifying amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology. However, the diagnostic accuracy of commercial plasma biomarker assays in predicting PET-defined AD stages-particularly late-stage tau accumulation-requires further evaluation. We included 229 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, all of whom underwent amyloid and tau PET imaging and testing with plasma assays. Among the plasma biomarkers, p-tau217 showed the strongest linear and non-linear associations with amyloid and tau PET. When distinguishing A + from A - T - participants, p-tau217 assays achieved the highest accuracy (AUC range: 0.85-0.91), outperforming other plasma biomarkers (AUC range: 0.66-0.81). However, the accuracy of plasma biomarkers, including p-tau217 assays, significantly decreased when differentiating A + T + from A + T - stages (AUC for p-tau217 assays: 0.69-0.77; AUC for other plasma biomarkers: 0.53-0.67; P < 0.05). These findings were replicated in an independent cohort (n = 334). Our study found that among currently available commercial plasma assays, including p-tau217 assays, they demonstrate high accuracy in classifying Aβ status but are less accurate in assessing tau pathology severity in Aβ positive individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784652What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.