ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Gender-specific economic interventions for women's mental health and well-being in South Asia: a systematic review.
Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) in South Asia is higher among women than men. Reasons include lower socioeconomic status and greater exposure to social, economic and environmental disadvantage. Economic determinants are important, modifiable risk factors for CMDs.
aimsThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the evidence for impacts of economic interventions on women's well-being and CMD outcomes in South Asia.
methodWe searched for peer-reviewed quantitative research studies in eight databases (3ie, EconLit, Embase Classic, Embase, Global Health, J-PAL, Medline, APA PsychInfo, Scopus) and studies included in relevant systematic reviews of economic interventions which measured CMDs and well-beingamong female participants in South Asia. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Following data extraction, we synthesised our findings through narrative synthesis.
resultsWe identified eight eligible studies evaluating five types of economic intervention: microfinance, employment, conditional cash transfers, self-help groups (SHGs) and economic empowerment programmes. Studies were conducted in Afghanistan (n = 1), Bangladesh (n = 2) and India (n = 5). Approximately 60% of studies reported statistically significant associations between receipt of economic interventions and improved CMD symptoms or well-being among female participants. Risk of bias was moderate and study designs were heterogeneous. Attention to gendered risks of economic interventions in countries with strong patriarchal norms was limited.
conclusionThe limited published evidence suggests that economic interventions can have positive impacts on CMDs and well-being among women in South Asia. However, methodological limitations and lack of geographical representation mean that further research is needed to evaluate the risks and benefits of economic interventions for diverse women in South Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784653What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.