Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784777›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Function-oriented prevention in geriatrics-No autonomy without structural change].

Michael Denkinger, Ursula Müller-Werdan

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael DenkingerAGAPLESION Bethesda Klinik, Geriatrisches Zentrum Ulm, Institut für Geriatrische Forschung, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland. michael.denkinger@agaplesion.de.
Ursula Müller-WerdanMedizinische Klinik für Geriatrie und Altersmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of prevention in advanced age is less the avoidance of individual diagnoses and more the preservation of autonomy and functional capacity. Traditional categories, such as primary, secondary and tertiary prevention increasingly overlap as functional impairments and geriatric syndromes represent both risk factors and targets for intervention. Current care structures in Germany reveal a significant gap: isolated programs are insufficient to effectively prevent recurrent hospitalizations and the transition into long-term care dependency. Outpatient geriatric centers, connected to geriatric hospital departments, can serve as interdisciplinary hubs. Working in collaboration with primary care physicians, they enable early screening of relevant risks (e.g., sarcopenia, fall risk, polypharmacy), coordinate rehabilitative and preventive measures after hospital discharge and establish reliable entry points into preventive care, for example, through routine geriatric baseline assessments beginning at retirement age. The key elements are summarized in a table in the article, including cardiovascular prevention into advanced age, multifactorial fall prevention strategies incorporating nutrition and targeted exercise as well as differentiated deprescribing to minimize treatment-induced risks. Prevention in older adults can only be effectively implemented through structured outpatient services and professional case management.

Indexed as

GeriatricsPersonal AutonomyAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overGeriatric AssessmentGermanyHumansSecondary PreventionFall prevention, multifactorialGeriatric centersOld ageSecondary preventionTertiary prevention

Identifiers

PMID41784777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.