ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Multicenter international experience with the Hugo™ RAS platform in colorectal surgery: reproducibility and real-world outcomes from the COLOROBOT IBERICA study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hugo RAS Versus Da Vinci in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Outcome Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly relevant in colorectal procedures, particularly with the emergence of new modular platforms. Multicenter real-world data on the Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) system remains limited. The COLOROBOT IBERICA study is a multicenter retrospective analysis including 285 consecutive patients who underwent elective robotic colorectal surgery using the Hugo™ RAS system between April 2023 and December 2024 across six centers in Spain and Portugal. Demographic data, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo classification, and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of operative time and adverse outcomes. A total of 285 patients were included (median age 69 years; 53% male). Median total operative time was 210 min (IQR 160–243), with a median docking time of 6 min (IQR 5–9) and a median console time of 121 min (IQR 95–146). Estimated blood loss was ≤ 500 mL in 92% of cases. Conversion rate was 1.1%. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 19.2% of patients, with major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III) in 8.0%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 5.6%, and 4.5% of patients required reintervention. Anticoagulation and neoadjuvant therapy were independently associated with increased morbidity and anastomotic leakage. No robot-related setup factors were associated with complication severity. In this large multicenter real-world cohort, the Hugo™ RAS platform enabled safe, effective, and reproducible colorectal surgery with low conversion rates and acceptable morbidity across different institutions and surgeon profiles. These findings support the scalable integration of modular robotic technology into routine colorectal practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.