ArticlePloS one2026
Clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: A comprehensive analysis of associated factors.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a significant cause of hospitalization and mortality globally. Optimizing clinical outcomes in CAP depends heavily on timely, appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy. However, limited data from low- and middle-income countries hinder effective stewardship efforts. The study aims to assess clinical outcomes among hospitalized CAP patients in Lebanon and identify key factors associated with deterioration or death, with particular emphasis on the role of guideline concordant empiric antibiotic prescribing. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in five tertiary hospitals across Lebanon between January and June 2024. Adult patients admitted with CAP were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and treatment data were extracted. Antibiotic regimens were evaluated for adherence to national CAP guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of poor clinical outcomes, defined as ICU admission or in-hospital death. Results: Inappropriate antibiotic selection (aOR=18.81, p< 0.001) and dosing (aOR=1.78, p=0.027) were significantly associated with poor outcomes. Additional predictors included advanced age, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, elevated WBC, and CURB-65 scores ≥ 3. Conversely, patients with classical CAP presentations (e.g., wheezing, rales) were more likely to experience favorable outcomes. Conclusion: Inappropriate empiric antibiotic prescribing significantly worsens clinical outcomes in hospitalized CAP patients. These findings underscore the urgent need for strengthening antimicrobial stewardship programs, implementing clinical decision support tools, and reinforcing physician education to promote adherence to national guidelines and improve patient safety.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.