ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Metabolic and behavioral effects of neurofibromin result from differential recruitment of MAPK and mTOR signaling.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 results from mutations in the NF1 gene and its encoded neurofibromin protein. This condition produces multiple symptoms, including tumors, behavioral alterations, and metabolic changes. Molecularly, neurofibromin mutations affect Ras activity, influencing multiple downstream signaling pathways, including MAPK (Raf/MEK/ERK) and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling. This pleiotropy raises the question of which pathways could be targeted to treat the disease symptoms, and whether different phenotypes driven by neurofibromin mutations exhibit similar or diverging dependence on the signaling pathways downstream of Ras. To test this, we examined metabolic and behavioral alterations in the genetically tractable Drosophila neurofibromatosis type 1 model. In vivo genetic analysis revealed that behavioral effects of neurofibromin were mediated by MEK signaling, with no necessity for Akt. In contrast, metabolic effects of neurofibromin were mediated by coordinated actions MEK/ERK and Akt/mTOR/S6K/4E-BP signaling. At the systemic level, loss of neurofibromin dysregulated metabolism via molecular effects in interneurons and muscle. These changes were accompanied by altered muscle mitochondria morphology, with no concomitant changes in neuronal ultrastructure or neuronal mitochondria. Overall, this suggests that neurofibromin mutations affect multiple signaling cascades downstream of Ras, which differentially affect metabolic and behavioral neurofibromatosis type 1 phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.