ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Wild vegetables contribute to improving the diversity and sustainability of vegetable diets in China.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence to a Chinese planetary health diet, environmental impacts, and all-cause mortality risk: a prospective cohort study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey.European journal of nutrition · 2026Observational
- Reversing vegetable biodiversity loss to diversify diets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Characterization of saponin biotransformation driven by intrinsic proteins inFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Roles of Edible Flowers in Local Food Systems of Baise City, Guangxi, China.Biology · 2026Article
- Cultivated Vegetation Shapes Diversity and Stability of Spontaneous Herbaceous Communities in Residential Green Spaces.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vegetables are vital to human diets, supplying essential micronutrients critical to overall health. Despite this, it remains unclear whether current supply systems effectively ensure equitable access to cultivated vegetables across regions or fully leverage the potential of wild vegetables to diversify diets. Here, we analyzed data from 2,983 supermarkets across 330 cities for cultivated vegetables, alongside a comprehensive database of 2,461 species of wild vegetables, to evaluate the current state of vegetable supply and the potential of wild vegetables to enhance dietary diversity in China. Our analysis revealed that the species richness of cultivated vegetables is relatively low, with markets predominantly offering 52 common species. Wealthier regions exhibited greater diversity in cultivated vegetable offerings, while the availability of common cultivated vegetables was equitable and consistently distributed across vast areas of the country. However, overreliance on a few dominant species has led to a homogenization of vegetable diets across the country. Conversely, wild vegetables demonstrated a significantly richer species pool with notable regional variations. These wild vegetables serve as an important supplemental food source, particularly in regions with limited diversity of cultivated vegetables. They contribute to food security and nutrition, especially during shortages, and align with traditional food preferences in local communities. The broad distribution and rich diversity of wild vegetables present valuable opportunities for germplasm and essential micronutrient sources for humans. Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of the current state and limitations of cultivated vegetable supply, emphasizing the untapped potential of wild vegetables in diversifying and enriching human diets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.