ReviewPharmacopsychiatry2026
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development: Raising Quality per Decision.
Review in Pharmacopsychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Drug research and development continuously encounters prolonged timelines, escalating costs, and high attrition rates. In this narrative review, we integrated recent advances in artificial intelligence across target identification, drug repurposing, de novo molecular design, structural biology, safety prediction, and artificial intelligence-supported clinical development, aligning these innovations with evolving global regulatory frameworks. Predictive and interpretable artificial intelligence could enhance the quality of decision-making throughout the research and development process when combined with causal or mechanistic priors, synthesis-aware and physics-informed molecular design, external validation with clear applicability domains, and governance systems aligned with multiple regulatory guidelines and qualified digital endpoint applications. Case studies of artificial intelligence-assisted discovery and repurposing demonstrate shorter development timelines, improved compound quality, and higher-level early-phase success, while underscoring challenges such as overfitting, model generalizability, and dataset bias. Establishing a context-of-use-based "credibility plan" and adopting equity-by-design through the inclusion of non-European datasets and subgroup performance evaluation are essential for achieving generalizable impact. Artificial intelligence integration with new approach methodologies and adaptive or covariate-adjusted clinical trials may help reduce development inefficiency without compromising scientific or ethical rigor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.