ArticleScientific reports2026
In-hospital outcomes and temporal analysis of paralyzed patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the association between two major etiologies of paralysis and the in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We retrieved AMI patients undergoing PCI from the National Inpatient Sample (2003-2015) and divided them into without paralysis, spinal cord injury (SCI) paralysis, and stroke paralysis. Paralysis' impact on hospital outcomes was explored using multivariate regression. Interaction analysis was used to investigate the sex differences. We observed the temporal trends of in-hospital outcomes from 2003 to 2015 by paralysis etiology. A total of 2,151,994 AMI cases were identified, with 6,711 SCI paralysis and 8,322 stroke paralysis. Compared to patients without paralysis, patients with SCI but not stroke paralysis had increased rates of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.9), cardiogenic shock (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.8-3.3). Furthermore, this positive association between SCI and in-hospital adverse outcomes is more significant in females than males. In conclusion, SCI paralysis is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock in patients with AMI undergoing PCI, especially in females. These disparities lasted from 2003 to 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.