ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatiotemporal dynamics of heat stress and cold stress on UK rapeseed cropping over 1961-2020.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most temperature stress research in oil crops has focused on either heat or cold stress with analyses of the effects of both in combination rare. For the UK, neither the spatiotemporal hot spots of temperature stressed arable areas nor the comparative trends of heat and cold stresses for rapeseed cropping under climate change are understood. This study investigated the spatiotemporal heat and cold stresses for UK rapeseed over 1961–2020, and quantified the normalized rapeseed production loss index (fRPL) induced by heat stress during flowering. Stress indices including a literature derived heat stress index (fHS), cold degree days (CDD), with historical land cover and crop productivity data were used to comparatively study both stresses and to estimate fRPL. Results showed increasing fHS, particularly during flowering (April to May) and main yield-forming reproductive stages (spanning flowering through pod and seed development from April to July) over the study period, with fHS being negatively correlated with latitude. The decreasing values of CDD and frequency of cold stress suggest cold stress decreased during the flowering, vegetative (September to November) and reproductive stages. Notably, this study observed that annually at the UK level heat stress was increasing at a faster rate than cold stress was decreasing during flowering. The increasing values of fRPL, with significant differences between decades and regions, suggested an increasing production loss. These results presented a potentially trend of increasing heat stress impacts on future rapeseed production and further work is required to understand the specific impacts and mitigation strategies for addressing UK food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.