Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786891›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Emotional scars: limbic brain processing alterations in adults with childhood abuse across mental health disorders.

Mayuresh S Korgaonkar, Cheryl Tobler, Kim Felmingham, Leanne M Williams, Richard A Bryant, Isabella A Breukelaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mayuresh S KorgaonkarBrain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia. M.Korgaonkar@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-2221
Cheryl ToblerBrain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Kim FelminghamSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Leanne M WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9987-7360
Richard A Bryant *Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia. r.bryant@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-819X
Isabella A Breukelaar *Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-5274

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1008080Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1023043Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1073041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abuse experienced during childhood and adolescence significantly influences brain development and increases the risk of psychiatric disorders later in life. However, its long-term impact on emotion processing across psychiatric conditions remains underexplored. In this functional MRI study, we examined a sample of 635 individuals with and without childhood abuse, including people with depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD, and healthy controls, to investigate differences in brain activation during conscious and non-conscious emotional face processing. Brain activation across regions involved in emotional regulation was compared in response to negative (anger, fear, disgust, sadness), happy and neutral facial expressions. Individuals exposed to abuse before age 13 showed heightened hippocampal activation during non-conscious negative emotion processing compared to non-abused individuals, an effect absent in those exposed to abuse between ages 13 and 18. Additionally, amygdala activation during conscious emotion processing was elevated across all emotions in individuals who experienced adolescent abuse (13-18 years), compared to both abuse-free individuals and those exposed to early childhood abuse. This transdiagnostic approach highlights distinct vulnerability windows in brain development, with differential effects on emotion processing depending on the timing of abuse. Our study provides novel insights into how early life adversities shapes emotional processing, advancing our understanding of its transdiagnostic impact on brain function.

Indexed as

BrainChild AbuseAdolescentAdultAdult Survivors of Child AbuseAmygdalaAnxiety DisordersBrain MappingChildEmotionsFacial ExpressionFemaleHippocampusHumansLimbic SystemMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID41786891
PMCPMC13269135

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.