ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
PM
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution is a major cardiovascular risk factor, with particulate matter (PM) posing significant threats. The Po Valley remains among Europe's most polluted areas. While PM₂.₅ is linked to cardiac dysfunction, its effects during pregnancy-especially under hypertensive conditions-are poorly defined. We investigated how prolonged PM exposure from Milan's urban area affects cardiac electromechanical function in pregnant normotensive and hypertensive rats, and in a human embryonic stem cell-derived 3D cardiac spheroid. Pregnant normotensive and hypertensive (SHR) rats were exposed to saline solutions w/wo PM (2 mg/kg) three times weekly for 19 days. Cardiac spheroids were cultured in DMEM w/wo PM (10-50 µg/mL) for 8 days. We assessed cardiac function via in-vivo epicardial mapping and in-vitro optokinematic analysis. Inflammatory, toxicological, and molecular profiles were evaluated. Machine learning classified electrogram profiles in PM-exposed versus unexposed rats. In SHR rats, PM exposure increased rheobase (+ 39%), current threshold (+ 32%), and chronaxie (+ 71%), with a 21% rise in effective refractory period. Conduction velocity and anisotropy were also altered. Machine learning achieved > 86% and > 77% classification accuracy in normotensive and SHR, respectively. In human cardiac spheroids derived from embryonic stem cells, short-term PM exposure impaired relaxation (- 36% at 10 µg/mL; - 21.5% at 20 µg/mL) and contraction amplitude (- 42% and - 62%, respectively). Long-term evaluation disrupted calcium transients (- 20% and - 15%) and altered IL-6. Gene expression revealed dysregulation of calcium-handling genes. These findings emphasize the heightened risks of PM exposure during gestation, particularly in preeclampsia, and support the need for public health strategies to protect maternal and fetal cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.