Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787129›Full record

ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026

Prophylactic and postoperative antibiotic therapy for coronectomy procedures in mandibular third molars: mapping the evidence through a scoping review.

Lucas Jardim da Silva, Laura Lourenço Morel, Júlia Rodrigues Burkert, Josué Martos, Cristina Braga Xavier, Melissa Feres Damian

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucas Jardim da SilvaPost-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-7832
Laura Lourenço MorelPost-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-311X
Júlia Rodrigues Burkert, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-0044
Josué MartosDepartment of Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1988-9463
Cristina Braga XavierDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-2773
Melissa Feres DamianDepartment of Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. melissaferesdamian@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-7132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review systematically maps and summarizes the available evidence, identifies patterns, and highlights gaps in the current literature on antibiotic use in coronectomy procedures.

methodsDatabases were searched up to June 2025 for human clinical studies evaluating the coronectomy technique for mandibular third molars that reported pre- or postoperative antibiotic use. In addition to manuscript identification, study design, evaluated outcomes, and sample characteristics, the collected data focused on antibiotic regimens, postoperative infection rates, and other reported complications, such as dry socket. The data were analyzed descriptively and summarized via tables and figures.

resultsFifty studies evaluating approximately 2,126 patients were included. The included studies reported substantial heterogeneity in antibiotic protocols for coronectomy. Postoperative antibiotic administration was the most frequently described approach, most commonly involving amoxicillin, either alone or in combination with clavulanate for 3–7 days, whereas other agents were prescribed less frequently. Postoperative infection and complications were reported in approximately 60 patients (2.82% of patients sample). Amoxicillin was the most frequently reported antibiotic in these cases, general practice reflecting its overall predominance in coronectomy protocols rather than indicating any association with postoperative complications.

conclusionThe available evidence remains insufficient to support standardized antibiotic protocols or to determine the necessity of routine antibiotic use in coronectomy procedures. These findings underscore the importance of cautious antibiotic prescribing and highlight the need for further controlled studies to better inform clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisMolar, ThirdSurgical Wound InfectionTooth CrownTooth ExtractionAmoxicillinHumansMandiblePostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticOral surgical procedureReview literature as a topicThird molar

Identifiers

PMID41787129
PMCPMC12963269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.