ReviewNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2026
Post-Stroke Motor Fatigability: Defining and Studying the Impairments That Emerge During Prolonged Motor Tasks.
Review in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundFatigue, a complex and multidimensional complaint, is highly prevalent after stroke and contributes to adverse outcomes and impaired motor recovery. Here, we focus on post-stroke motor fatigability (PSMF), which refers to objective limitations in continuous motor performance post-stroke. PSMF can impair the performance of activities of daily living and may significantly hinder rehabilitation efforts, limiting progress and recovery.ObjectivesThe purpose of this review is to summarize the current understanding of PSMF and to evaluate various tools used to investigate its underlying mechanisms.ResultsPrior studies on PMSF differ significantly in their approaches, with some employing neurophysiology and neurostimulation to investigate neural mechanisms, while others focus on functional assessments. Inconsistent terminology and the lack of standardized methodology are key barriers to reaching meaningful conclusions. While there is some consensus that central factors in the neuromuscular pathway limit sustained motor activity more than peripheral factors, additional research is needed to understand the timing and pathophysiology of PSMF including its relationship with other impairments of motor control. We present several specific recommendations for future studies, including the use of proper taxonomy to demystify the patient complaint, consistent paradigms to evoke fatigability, and neurophysiological tools to locate its origin.ConclusionApplying these guidelines to future investigations will help researchers better identify stroke-specific limitations in continuous motor performance and develop tailored interventions to help patients adjust to the persistent, repetitive demands of daily life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.