ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Development of machine learning models for early prediction of small for-gestational-age births using maternal sociodemographic and obstetric data.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall for gestational age (SGA) is a significant concern in obstetrics, with implications for stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and long-term health outcomes. The early detection of SGA is crucial for prevention and treatment, but current methods have limitations. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) models-based algorithm to predict SGA using sociodemographic and obstetric features during the preconception period.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed first-trimester attendees (1 Jan 2022–31 Dec 2023) and developed parity-stratified prediction models (nulliparous vs. primiparous) using routinely available sociodemographic and obstetric variables at the first prenatal visit. Five algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and extra trees) were trained using an 80/20 stratified train–test split with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Reporting was guided by TRIPOD + AI recommendations for prediction model development and validation.
resultsAmong nulliparous women, logistic regression achieved accuracy 72.7% and AUC 0.733 (95% CI for accuracy 0.464–0.990). Among primiparous women, XGBoost achieved accuracy 80% and AUC 0.92 (95% CI for accuracy 0.552–1.000). Anthropometric variables (weight, BMI, height) and previous birth weight (primiparous) were most influential predictors.
conclusionAn ML model constructed with basic maternal sociodemographic findings and obstetric history may serve as an early prediction tool for SGA during the preconception period, particularly in resource-constrained settings, although broader validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.