ArticleBMC health services research2026
Adoption, digital health literacy, and patient satisfaction of Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission: an analytical cross-sectional study among outpatient department attendees.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) is India’s ambitious effort to establish a complete digital health ecosystem. However, evidence on real-world adoption, user experiences, and barriers among target populations remains limited.
objectivesTo estimate the adoption of ABHA ID registration services among outpatient department (OPD) attendees in tertiary care hospitals, and to assess patient satisfaction, digital health literacy levels, and identify barriers, gaps, and limitations in accessing healthcare through ABDM.
methodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 425 outpatient department (OPD) attendees across three tertiary care hospitals in Agra using multistage random sampling from September 2024 to April 2025. ABHA ID registrations adoption rates were calculated from hospital records over eight months in comparison with conventional OPD registration (non-digital paper based). Digital health literacy was assessed using the validated 21-item Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI). Patient satisfaction was measured using a structured 10-item Likert scale questionnaire. Barriers, gaps, and limitations were evaluated through structured interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsThe study was conducted among 425 outpatient department (OPD) attendees. In which 537,278 total OPD visits, 129,007 completed ABHA ID registrations with a below average monthly adoption rate of 23.96%. Overall digital health literacy was moderate (mean DHLI score: 2.94 ± 0.72) among 425 OPD attendees, with males scoring significantly higher than females (U = 15,922, p < .001). Education showed the strongest positive correlation with DHLI scores (ρ = 0.480, p < .001) while age showed a weak negative correlation (ρ=-0.230, p < .001). Participants demonstrated better operational skills (2.38 ± 0.64) but weaker abilities in evaluating reliability (2.18 ± 0.66) and protecting privacy (2.22 ± 0.65). Patient satisfaction was high with over 80% agreeing that ABDM made registration easier and was user-friendly. However, only 55% felt comfortable with data privacy protection. Major barriers included preference for in-person healthcare (85.6%), high data plan costs (81.9%), difficulty using health apps (65.6%), language difficulties (64.0%) and hesitation to share one time password (OTP) (60.0%). Notably, 88% expressed need for training and support, while 58.6% lacked adequate knowledge about ABDM despite visiting participating facilities.
conclusionWhile ABDM demonstrates operational efficiency and moderate patient user satisfaction, adoption of ABHA registration remains limited in comparison to conventional OPD registrations, with significant barriers related to digital literacy, awareness, economic constraints, and privacy concerns. Substantial gender, age, and educational disparities exist in digital health literacy. To achieve equitable and sustainable adoption, targeted interventions are essential, including community-based digital literacy programs, simplified multilingual interfaces, strengthened privacy safeguards, subsidized data access, and on-site support through trained facilitators particularly for vulnerable populations including women, older adults, and those with lower educational attainment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.