Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2026
Omicron infection alters the profile of organ failure in severe COVID-19: a multicenter study comparing Omicron and the wild-type strain.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has exhibited altered transmissibility and virulence compared with the Wild-type strain. Currently, no research has focused on the differences in organ failure caused by the two strains. Understanding the clinical characteristics and organ failure patterns of Omicron infection is essential to improve management strategies for severe cases.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective observational study included two cohorts: the Omicron cohort, consisting of 7,000 COVID-19 patients admitted to 10 national research centers in China from December 2022 to January 2023, and the Wild-type cohort, consisting of 733 patients from designated hospitals during the early outbreak in 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. We compared the differences in patient characteristics, developments of organ dysfunction and outcomes between the two cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to identify risk factors for severe COVID-19 and death.
resultsThe Omicron cohort included 7000 patients, 1551 (22.2%) of whom had severe cases. The median age of the patients was 73.0 [60.0, 84.0] years, with 4319 male patients (61.7%). Regarding underlying comorbidities, 5305 patients (75.7%) presented with at least one chronic condition, most frequently hypertension (46.0%) and diabetes mellitus (26.3%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 15.5%, and 5666 patients (80.9%) experienced at least one organ dysfunction, with respiratory failure being the most prevalent (72.6%). Compared with the Wild-type cohort, severe Omicron patients were older, had a greater proportion of males, and more comorbidities. Severe Omicron cases showed a distinct pattern characterized by a higher prevalence of extrapulmonary organ dysfunction, particularly kidney failure. Multivariate analysis identified older age, male sex, lack of vaccination, preadmission corticosteroid use, and comorbidities as independent predictors of severe disease. Among severe patients, older age, malignancy, hypoxemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated troponin were independent predictors of mortality.
conclusionAfter the widespread emergence of Omicron, severe COVID-19 predominantly affected older patients with multiple comorbidities and showed a different organ failure spectrum, with greater extrapulmonary involvement, particularly kidney failure, in the early phase of hospitalization. These findings highlight the evolving clinical and pathophysiological features of COVID-19 in the Omicron era. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.