ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Preoperative imaging predictors of subsidence of 3D-printed artificial cervical vertebral bodies: a cohort study of 102 patients with nomogram development and validation.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubsidence of an interbody implant, defined as its sinking into adjacent bone, is a common complication that can compromise spinal fusion outcomes and may require revision surgery. Custom 3D-printed titanium vertebral bodies are increasingly used for anterior spinal reconstruction. However, their reported subsidence incidence (15–30%) remains comparable to conventional cages. Early identification of high-risk patients is therefore crucial. This study aimed to identify preoperative imaging predictors of 3D-printed vertebral body subsidence and develop a nomogram for individualized risk prediction.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 patients (2020–2024) who underwent single-level anterior corpectomy and fusion with a custom 3D-printed titanium vertebral body. Preoperative CT and MRI metrics—including lower adjacent vertebral Hounsfield units (HU), endplate concavity depth, endplate angle, and Modic changes—were assessed as candidate risk factors. Subsidence was defined as implant sinking ≥ 3 mm at the prespecified 3-month postoperative follow-up. Independent predictors were identified by multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram was constructed. Model performance was evaluated by area under the ROC curve (AUC), along with calibration and decision curve analysis, and internally validated via bootstrap resampling.
resultsSubsidence occurred in 32 of 102 patients (31.4%). Multivariate logistic regression identified lower adjacent vertebral HU, greater endplate concavity depth, and presence of Modic changes as independent predictors of subsidence. The predictive model showed excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.896, 95% CI 0.821–0.970) and remained robust after internal validation (bootstrap-corrected AUC ~ 0.886). It also demonstrated good calibration and a positive net clinical benefit on decision curve analysis.
conclusionsThe major risk factors for 3D-printed vertebral body subsidence (poor bone quality and weak endplate integrity) are similar to those for conventional cages. Our imaging-based nomogram provides accurate risk stratification to guide personalized surgical strategies—such as bone density optimization or use of larger implants in high-risk cases—while avoiding unnecessary interventions in low-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.