ArticleBMC nursing2026
Key challenges in nurse-led foot care education for persons with diabetes: an international survey across six countries.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic foot ulcers affect approximately one-third of people with diabetes during their lifetime and are a major cause of disability, amputation, and premature death. Preventing foot ulcers requires effective patient education. International guidelines have highlighted the central role of nurses in teaching routine foot care practices. However, nurse-led education varies considerably across healthcare systems, and it remains unclear which educational elements are consistently neglected internationally. This study aimed to identify common challenges in nurses’ self-reported implementation of foot care education for persons with diabetes across six countries.
methodsA cross-national survey was conducted with 412 nurses in China, Japan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Nigeria, and Trinidad and Tobago, recruited via non-probability convenience sampling. Using the 15-item Diabetic Foot Care Education Scale nurse version, nurses rated how often they delivered each item on a five-point scale. Responses of 1–2 (“never/rarely”) were classified as low implementation. The item-specific pooled benchmark for low implementation was calculated, and items exceeding the benchmark in ≥ 2 countries were identified as common challenges. Cross-country differences were examined using chi-square tests with Holm–Bonferroni adjustment.
resultsMost participants were female (95.1%), with a median age of 43 years (IQR 35–51); 63.6% had more than 10 years of clinical nursing experience, and 73.8% had at least 3 years of diabetes care experience. Nine of the 15 items consistently identified low implementation across countries. In particular, footwear inspection and sock-fitting education differed significantly across countries (all p_holm < 0.05, Cramér’s V ranged from 0.20 to 0.33). These findings indicate that key preventive elements of foot care, such as footwear inspection and appropriate sock selection, were not sufficiently addressed in nurse-led education for persons with diabetes.
conclusionsThis multi-country study identified both substantial variability among countries as well as shared international gaps in nurses’ implementation of foot care education. These findings indicate the importance of strengthening the implementation of commonly under-addressed educational elements while considering local contexts. By providing comparative evidence across diverse settings, this study may help inform context-sensitive educational strategies and support efforts to prevent diabetic foot ulcers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.