ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2026
Bioinformatic and computational biophysics tools for nanopore engineering: a review from standard approaches to machine learning advancements.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epx4 Nanopore With Multiple Constrictions for Single-Molecule Identification.Small methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanopores are key components in several emerging technologies. Nanopore sensors allow the observation of single molecules from the signature they leave in the ionic current flowing through the pore, while nanoporous membranes provide a potentially customizable platform to achieve unprecedented ion selectivity performance. In parallel to the improvements in the fabrication techniques, computational methods have flourished in the last few years. However, despite these advancements, bioinformatic and computational biophysics tools are still not systematically employed in nanopore research when compared to other engineering fields that integrated computer-assisted design (CAD) in their development pipeline decades ago. This review aims to provide a wide-ranging overview of the main bioinformatic tools useful for the engineering of biological nanopores including: analysing the effect of mutations on pore properties, determining the protonation state at different pH and studying the electrostatic environment via adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS). A final section presents recent progress in de novo design using AI-based methods. To favour the widespread adoption of these approaches, the Supplementary Information contains some scripts and protocols that may aid the readers to integrate these tools in their design approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.