ReviewInternational journal of stem cells2026
Investigating the Causal Links between the Aging Process and Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis.
Review in International journal of stem cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global societies age, the prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, is rapidly increasing, intensifying the need to understand the mechanisms of aging and their contribution to these conditions. Consequently, the focus of aging research has shifted from the traditional concept of chronological age to a more nuanced understanding of biological age. This has spurred active investigation into robust biomarkers, including cellular senescence. However, the application of classical senescence markers to the brain presents a substantial challenge, as their validity in post-mitotic cells, such as neurons, remains unclear. In this review, we highlight the limitations of the current metrics for cellular senescence as indicators of biological aging, and propose a path forward focused on identifying and modeling cell-type-specific aging markers within the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.