ArticleAlpha psychiatry2026
Group Sparse Representation Enhances Brain Network Classification of Major Depressive Disorder in Two Chinese Cohorts.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with altered organization of functional brain networks. This study aims to evaluate the classification efficacy of three brain networks constructed by Pearson correlation (PC), sparse representation (SR), and group sparse representation (GSR) in distinguishing patients with MDD from healthy controls (HCs). Methods: The present study involved the recruitment of 117 Chinese participants, comprising 61 individuals diagnosed with MDD and 56 HCs, all of whom underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Brain time-series signals were extracted from 116 regions to construct whole-brain networks utilizing PC, SR, and GSR. A linear support vector machine (SVM) classifier with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) feature selection was trained using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to optimize generalizability. An independent dataset of Chinese (124 first-episode drug-naïve MDD and 105 HCs) was utilized for additional validation. Results: Compared to the PC and SR, the GSR network yielded superior classification results, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, an accuracy of 0.81, and a sensitivity of 0.95. Similar results were observed in the independent MDD dataset. We identified 17 brain connections and 27 brain regions within the GSR network. Conclusions: Our findings support the adoption of GSR-based brain networks as a robust tool for MDD diagnosis, challenging the conventional reliance on PC in neuroimaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.